Bill Britton
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2007
- Messages
- 1,500
OK...Banning someone is like firing someone. You don't even need a reason. Just make him go away.
If that's what you think.
Be aware. Banning someone for impersonating someone else, than later finding out that they were not. Is gonna leave the website owner in a potentially 'bad' legal position if the person that was banned pushed it.
It's called character assassination. And everyone who pushed for it would be guilty of defamation or libel.
http://definitions.u...-assassination/
http://en.wikipedia....wiki/Defamation
Here is the definition of 'libel';
There are several ways a person must go about proving that libel has taken place. For example, in the United States, the person first must prove that the statement was false. Second, that person must prove that the statement caused harm. And, third, they must prove that the statement was made without adequate research into the truthfulness of the statement. These steps are for an ordinary citizen. In the case of a celebrity or public official trying to prove libel, they must prove the first three steps, and must (in the United States) prove the statement was made with the intent to do harm, or with reckless disregard for the truth. Usually specifically referred to as "proving malice".
Last edited by a moderator: