- Joined
- Nov 25, 2003
- Messages
- 16,198
Like the title says what would be the best choices for motor/ESC/battery components to convert a 60 sized outrigger to a strong FE boat? What FE class would it run in?
Don I would look into a Q set up. That would be 2X 6S Lipos. The Neu Motors are the way to go. I would think you would have a couple of choices 1527/1Y or the 1527/1.5D. Going to 6S you will probably want to go with an HV (High Voltage) Controller. A Castle Creations Hydra HV180 should cover both of those setups assuming you don't over prop them. The 1Y motor is 1,250 RPM/Volt and would be more on the conservative side compared to the 1.5D motor 1,500 RPM/Volt.Like the title says what would be the best choices for motor/ESC/battery components to convert a 60 sized outrigger to a strong FE boat? What FE class would it run in?
There are other routes that you can go buy getting a "budget" speed control and "budget" Lipos. When I gave you the suggestions that I listed above I was trying to adheare to your suggestion of "Strong"a strong FE boat?
It's all good Mike, if I build one I wouldn't go "budget". We all know that usually winds up as another way to say buy it twice.There are other routes that you can go buy getting a "budget" speed control and "budget" Lipos. When I gave you the suggestions that I listed above I was trying to adheare to your suggestion of "Strong"a strong FE boat?
http://www.offshoreelectrics.com/proddetail.php?prod=hef-sword-240hv
http://www.hobbycity.com/hobbycity/store/uh_viewItem.asp?idProduct=10304&Product_Name=Turnigy_4000mAh_6S_40C_Lipo_Pack
http://www.hobbycity.com/hobbycity/store/uh_viewItem.asp?idProduct=10332&Product_Name=Turnigy_Monster-2000_200A_4-12S_Brushless_ESC
Later,
Mike
How wide and tall would you recommend a Q rigger tub be? Would 4" inside to inside and 2" tall be enough?The tough part is getting all of the “stuff” packaged into a typical Nitro built rigger. Typically you will find the motor in the rear of the hull (near the front of radio box), and the batteries and controller towards the front. If you lucky the tub would be wide enough to get the batteries side by side and then put the controller in-between the two (batteries and motor), all the while maintaining your COG. The best scenario would be to have all of those components in your hand and build/modify a hull that can hold them.
I'm well aware of the P-spec class, just ask my D12 FE guys.Mr. Ferrette I know you are asking about a .60 rigger but if I could suggest stepping down to a .21 size you could do a "spec" one for a third of that price. Folks are in the 60s now and it's FE's biggest up and coming class. Here is a link to one of them.
JAE FE in spec running gear.
yeah, they're giving us a FIT!! a fe jae is first in b hydro in d-12, and an ob sundowner is in second. both of us are rigger newbies, what is this class coming to ????? maybe this is what obama meant by diversity LOLI'm well aware of the P-spec class, just ask my D12 FE guys.Mr. Ferrette I know you are asking about a .60 rigger but if I could suggest stepping down to a .21 size you could do a "spec" one for a third of that price. Folks are in the 60s now and it's FE's biggest up and coming class. Here is a link to one of them.
JAE FE in spec running gear.
LOL ok. Well at least we are doing pretty good from the sounds of it. :lol:yeah, they're giving us a FIT!! a fe jae is first in b hydro in d-12, and an ob sundowner is in second. both of us are rigger newbies, what is this class coming to ????? maybe this is what obama meant by diversity LOLI'm well aware of the P-spec class, just ask my D12 FE guys.Mr. Ferrette I know you are asking about a .60 rigger but if I could suggest stepping down to a .21 size you could do a "spec" one for a third of that price. Folks are in the 60s now and it's FE's biggest up and coming class. Here is a link to one of them.
JAE FE in spec running gear.
Don,So is Q equivalent to a .45 or a .67/80 sized boat?? Looking at the Castle website a 40"+ scale would be an S or a T-
http://www.castlecreations.com/support/documents/neumotors-castle_boat_apps.pdf
:unsure:
I do agree with Lohring in this aspect... I like the idea of SPEC'ing a motor. If you can spec the motor it keeps cost and performace under control. The way FE tries to limit their classes is by hull length and voltage. There is no limitation to the motor winds, motor diameter, motor length.... etc...We run P spec hydros in the Pacific Northwest. They are a great replacement for 3.5 hydros. Next year we plan to develop a Q spec class to be similar to 7.5 powered boats. The principle for both classes is to keep costs down with low amp motors and speed controls. A Q spec boat would run a motor like this: http://www.offshoreelectrics.com/proddetail.php?prod=fei-580-L&cat=116 and the whole system should cost less than a 7.5 inboard engine. Battery costs should be similar to nitro fuel costs. Speeds should be as good as nitro (The P spec boats go 65+) and reliability is much better.
Lohring Miller
I think spec'ing a SINGLE motor is a pain in the ass and not a good way to go. Specing a LIST of motors, as we currently do in FE (hopefully officially sometime this winter), is the way to go, because not all hulls work with the same motors. You need a range of motors, which will allow more freedom with the hulls. The motors should have generally the same design and mass, etc., just like the current P-Spec/Limited stuff, and there should be a mechanism to allow new motor offerings to be dropped in, like P-Limited hopes to do in the official ruleset.I do agree with Lohring in this aspect... I like the idea of SPEC'ing a motor. If you can spec the motor it keeps cost and performace under control. The way FE tries to limit their classes is by hull length and voltage. There is no limitation to the motor winds, motor diameter, motor length.... etc...We run P spec hydros in the Pacific Northwest. They are a great replacement for 3.5 hydros. Next year we plan to develop a Q spec class to be similar to 7.5 powered boats. The principle for both classes is to keep costs down with low amp motors and speed controls. A Q spec boat would run a motor like this: http://www.offshoreelectrics.com/proddetail.php?prod=fei-580-L&cat=116 and the whole system should cost less than a 7.5 inboard engine. Battery costs should be similar to nitro fuel costs. Speeds should be as good as nitro (The P spec boats go 65+) and reliability is much better.
Lohring Miller
Ok the rigger hull I'm looking at has a 38" tub that is 4" wide inside to inside with an inside working height of 2 1/8" in the engine bay. The overall length from front sponson tip to rear sponson trailing edge is 42".Don,So is Q equivalent to a .45 or a .67/80 sized boat?? Looking at the Castle website a 40"+ scale would be an S or a T-
http://www.castlecreations.com/support/documents/neumotors-castle_boat_apps.pdf
:unsure:
Perhaps we should have started here; how long is the hull your trying to convert (length of boat without hardware installed)? In other words, tip of front sponsons to trailing edge of rears or to the tub transom if that is the furthest distance. To be in the "Q" Class you must be 40" or under. Again the problem is stuffing all of that stuff into a nitro purpose built hull. In most cases the tub height isn't tall enough...
When you start trying to outfit an "S" and "T" boat you’re talking about running a 2P configuration for batteries. That means 4 packs in one boat +motor +controller. I have seen a "T" rigger 10S set up in a "gas" sized boat.
Out of the NAMBA Book
HULL LENGTH MEASUREMENTS
a) Hulls in each class will not exceed the length given in the following table:
Class Maximum Length
M-2 N/A
N-1 N/A
N-2 27”
O 27”
P 34”
Q 40”
S 60”
T 60”
Enter your email address to join: