Rokieboater
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2005
- Messages
- 1,596
Doesn't the word "OUTBOARD" define itself? But then again I am a simpleton.
Not in racing it doesn't. But then, I'm a "rules lawyer"... so.Doesn't the word "OUTBOARD" define itself? But then again I am a simpleton.
Disregard - It certainly isnt my fight or worth my time, enjoy the ride............Great decision Bob. They were allowed in the past so that was the right decision to "grandfather" those three boats.
Thats true Darin. You can make that design work within the current NAMBA rules with a couple changes to the transom to allow removal and mounting to transom as one complete unit.Not in racing it doesn't. But then, I'm a "rules lawyer"... so.Doesn't the word "OUTBOARD" define itself? But then again I am a simpleton.
Considering that the Cadwell design IS a legal OPC Tunnel in the real world, it just brought up the question for me initially. Love tinkering with "different".
However, at least for FE, it's clearly NOT, based on our rules, which I posted above.
BUT... I know how to modify the hull and unit to make it so, so if I get one, I may give those mods a go.
I don't think anyone is suggesting that rigger is illeagal...i think it was a great design innovation...I wish more people who get into designing their own stuff and building them to increase records all over the world.Just to correct any impressions about the outboard hydro, it was designed and built by the very talented Mike Bontoft. I believe Rod Geraghty (spelling?) also built a similar outboard.
Lohring Miller
Looks fantastic Christian...will be good to see that bad boy on a DragonHi Kris ,
do you like my new outbord . Motor full watercooled ,ceramic bearing ,all outside mount stearable .Fin has to come will show later.
Enter your email address to join: