Darin Jordan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2005
- Messages
- 1,821
Thats true Mic. If part of the transom was removed and the unit could be unmounted as one assembly, and the cowling was cut to completely expose the assembly, it would be more likely to be considered.With a large enough hole in the transom and a mounting plate as part of the unit the one in Darin's example could be removed as "one unit" and qualify as an outboard. Per OPC rules. NAMBA or IMPBA have no clear definition of an outboard in their rule books. They seem to assume you know what an outboard is. That's why I refer to APBA rules as models tend to imitate full size. No where is there a definition of a transom.
Mic
BINGO Darin!!!!!...I should have remembered that I helped draft the NAMBA FE OPC rules. They clearly define an "outboard". ;-)
i) ii) An outboard is defined as a complete motor and propulsion unit that can be attached to and removed from the outside of the hull as one unit.
Outside of the hull being the key.
Thanks, guys.
Not according to posts 5 and 7 .. NAMBA or IMPBA have no clear definition of an outboard in their rule books. They seem to assume you know what an outboard is. That's why I refer to APBA rules as models tend to imitate full size. No where is there a definition of a transom.
Mic
Enter your email address to join: