WOW! A 1662 is one hell of a 40 hydro prop!Boat is hydro. It is a new Blue head picco.Was using a 1662 Sunday, with a old Iwin 45 pipe.
Trying to set the parabolic pipe up.
Norris
Boat is hydro. It is a new Blue head picco.Was using a 1662 Sunday, with a old Iwin 45 pipe.
Trying to set the parabolic pipe up.
Norris
Larry, thats what I use on my 40 cut back to 59/60m <_< a very fast propWOW! A 1662 is one hell of a 40 hydro prop!Boat is hydro. It is a new Blue head picco.Was using a 1662 Sunday, with a old Iwin 45 pipe.
Trying to set the parabolic pipe up.
Norris
What kind of rigger/hydro is it?
Larry Jr.
I think Mark's right on with his post. I've run the parabolic at 8.5 with a Barr cut 1657 at 80plus in a Crapshooter. If the new Blue Picco is more powerful, I'd run a full blade and start pitching it up.Fellas,
Way too much propeller for a 45 hydro. Try the pipe at 8.5" and a 1657 propeller
and tell us how that worked. Right Larry? Instead of so much propeller try setting
it deeper in the water for better efficiency. If the 1657 is not enough deeper in the
water, try pitching it up. I know someone running in the 80's with this combination.
Thanks,
Mark Sholund
Hey RJ,I think Mark's right on with his post. I've run the parabolic at 8.5 with a Barr cut 1657 at 80plus in a Crapshooter. If the new Blue Picco is more powerful, I'd run a full blade and start pitching it up.Fellas,
Way too much propeller for a 45 hydro. Try the pipe at 8.5" and a 1657 propeller
and tell us how that worked. Right Larry? Instead of so much propeller try setting
it deeper in the water for better efficiency. If the 1657 is not enough deeper in the
water, try pitching it up. I know someone running in the 80's with this combination.
Thanks,
Mark Sholund
RJ
Well Mark, Being Norris' pit man sunday I observed boat with a 57mm prop 14 or 1657 and boat was under propped.Fellas,
Way too much propeller for a 45 hydro. Try the pipe at 8.5" and a 1657 propeller
and tell us how that worked. Right Larry? Instead of so much propeller try setting
it deeper in the water for better efficiency. If the 1657 is not enough, deeper in the
water, try pitching it up. I know someone running in the 80's with this combination.
Thanks,
Mark Sholund
Hey RJ,I think Mark's right on with his post. I've run the parabolic at 8.5 with a Barr cut 1657 at 80plus in a Crapshooter. If the new Blue Picco is more powerful, I'd run a full blade and start pitching it up.Fellas,
Way too much propeller for a 45 hydro. Try the pipe at 8.5" and a 1657 propeller
and tell us how that worked. Right Larry? Instead of so much propeller try setting
it deeper in the water for better efficiency. If the 1657 is not enough deeper in the
water, try pitching it up. I know someone running in the 80's with this combination.
Thanks,
Mark Sholund
RJ
Was the stinger i.d stock or? Thanks
thanks RJ.Hey RJ,I think Mark's right on with his post. I've run the parabolic at 8.5 with a Barr cut 1657 at 80plus in a Crapshooter. If the new Blue Picco is more powerful, I'd run a full blade and start pitching it up.Fellas,
Way too much propeller for a 45 hydro. Try the pipe at 8.5" and a 1657 propeller
and tell us how that worked. Right Larry? Instead of so much propeller try setting
it deeper in the water for better efficiency. If the 1657 is not enough deeper in the
water, try pitching it up. I know someone running in the 80's with this combination.
Thanks,
Mark Sholund
RJ
Was the stinger i.d stock or? Thanks
Nice to hear from you Ron,
The stinger was stock but the inside baffle was drilled out to one size smaller than the stinger.
Later, Ron
Norris, You forgot to tell the guys that the new blue head motor isnt exactly stock....the 1662 was down to dia. of 1657.Got more pitch than a stock 1657. Was repitch on Martys 1662 duplicator.
The old Iwin pipe like a lot of pitch.
My old blue head,short stroke would that 1662 in high 70s all day.
Will try the parabolic on this weekend.
It was better than stock 1657.
Enter your email address to join: