The problem with the "car pipes" is they have absolutely no torque but they don't need it in cars.
With transmissions and adjustable clutches the motor is always in its powerband.
Rod,
Don't know for sure if this is relevant but your posts reminded me of something I stumbled accross years ago.
I've never played with .12's in boats but did a little testing in a car once with a side exhaust .12. Going to a smaller ID header with the same motor / pipe / gearing gave a noticable increase in bottom end (torque) AND an increase in upper rpm limit without altering the pipe length. It surprised me as to how effective it really was. I assumed that this was due to the huge difference in exhaust port area verses header cross sectional area.
I'm now wondering if it's a total volume of the header and the pipe being closer to correct?
Tim,That certainly is a plausable possibility.I don't know for "absolute sure" why you saw the performance increase.I suspect what happened is the reduced volume in the header/pipe combo caused an increase in motor exhaust temperature and as a result the wave speed increased and the motor found its sweet spot and staged up.
Your experience is just one more indicator that there is something in the pipe/cannister performance spectrum that has not being understood by us RC nitro boaters.
I can get .12/.21 motors to pretty much stage up at will these days by controlling the motor temperature so I do know where to start.What I don't know is how much effect the pipe/cannister "volume" fits into this equation.With the O.S. outboard I know volume plays a part in the overall picture,but just how much I don't know.
I don't know if it is wave speed,wave length or possibly wave pressure drop or something else that makes a motor stage up as hard as we saw this weekend in the .12.
The O.S. outboard muffler on the K&B test will tell us a ton about where to start to understand this phenomenon.
Rod Geraghty