Jeremy Linney
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 22, 2010
- Messages
- 286
Looking for someone who makes these in steel. Do not want an aluminum one. I want the shaft to be the weak link and not the coupler.
Have you had one go bad? Never heard of an aluminum one failing.Looking for someone who makes these in steel. Do not want an aluminum one. I want the shaft to be the weak link and not the coupler.
I disagree, Nitro motors have one pulse per revolution. Causing a shock to the flex cable every time. Brushless motors are much smoother being 4 to 6 poles. I have had zero issues running an 3.5 OS lower on my p_tunnel.Now, I'm not saying everyone should, It's just my personal preference. What works for me may not suit someone else.A full P power plant has the power of a 7.5 nitro engine with lots more torque. It's unrealistic to expect a unit designed for a 3.5 cc engine to hold up. the 3.5 lowers run well with P spec power plants as do the 3.5 sized boats. Full P power plants run better on 7.5 size boats except for SAW runs. See the topic on P spec tunnels in the tunnel forum for more information.
Lohring Miller
Yep....Flynn Flex's for the OS lower....nothing better.I have run 1 cable for 2 yrs on my P/L set up Chris Flynn makes a flex shaft that fits the OS on 1 end and larger to better fit the ALUIM coupler on the other.I also use a oiler no problems so far.
Enter your email address to join: