Hi Andrew,
It very well could be the same motor. For different reasons I hope it is not.
Here's the deal. When Chris had this motor made there were 4 options.
1. Can design. - the 8.4 and SS1 look like they share this
2. Brush compound. -There are several available options and the 8.4 and SS1 could share these as well. Chris had the best ones put in his.
3. Magnet compound. Again, the 8.4 and SS1 could share this component. Chris picked the newest and strongest available. I have the Neo and old 8.4 and the magnets aren't even close to being as strong as the SS1.
4. The armature. This is what would bother me. When Chris had Mabuchi build him this motor, the armature was custom wound for him. To get a job done like this he had to spend more money then I make in a year. In return he was guaranteed the exclusive rights to it and that it would NOT be sold under any circumstances to anyone other the Fine Design, countries included. I don't know if there was a time limit to this deal, but my guess is if it did, it would be longer then the 2 months you mentioned that it was offered to you.
Like I said, I hope the motors are different. If not, something wrong is at play.
I can see your side as I doubt you knew the background. The fact is, nobody else has stepped up the way Chris did to get this going. The wind and guage of wire on the SS1 was carefully thought out for the turbo trans nearly a year before LSH was even an Idea. I know that Chris was frustrated with how long they took to get produced, but in the end it worked out. By the time they were ready to build his motors he was able to choose the newer can, magnets and brushes.
Does this mean Mabuchi can't build a hotter motor? No. Just not the same as the SS1. If they did?????? Perhaps the new one is a wind more or less? I just hope it isn't the same.
All I know is the SS1 is WAY better then anything before it. If the new 8.4 is in it's league, then you've got something. Time to do some real testing!
My 2 cents, well, maybe 3.
Dick