Tunnel sponson bottom ride angles

Intlwaters

Help Support Intlwaters:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

drumzzzz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2003
Messages
45
does anyone know if a flatter bottom ride surface (closer to a rigger) affects stability, or turning response? Is there somewhat of a tradeoff of speed for stability?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks for the info, I'm definitely a newbie to tunnel theory. In the straightaways, does a flatter surface create more of an aerodynamic doom - the higher speed potential creates more ground effect and it wants to go airborne?

IMHO the overall speed (and blowover tendency) contrast of outriggers and scale hydros (aside from weight) seemed to be influenced by the built in aerodynamics of the scales hydros. Flat sponson ride areas are typically similar between the too.
 
One of the big differences between the Lynx and previous tunnels is increased angle (dihedral) of the bottoms. This is a higher drag configuration, but with the power we now have available even in stock engines, this is not the most important factor. Finishing the race, in what amounts to ocean racing conditions for that small of a boat, is. This is also one of the differences between Seducers and earlier mono designs. Riggers are so stable that they can use the lower drag flat sponsons. Other styles of hulls are faster through rough water with a deeper v.

Lohring Miller
 
I understand, especially due to the tremendous power to weight ratios, a little compromise of friction/speed for stability doesn't amount to much, especially if it makes the difference between finishing a race or not. The fastest boat doesn't always win comes to mind. :)
 
Back
Top