Joe Warren
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2003
- Messages
- 8,189
Has anyone ran 90 % Nitro fuel with 10% oil or less... I have been to 70 % but not above... Can the methanol be deleted? or must it remain as a refrigerant?
Joe, Rossi used to send with their motors a formula for speed racing. The best I can remember it was about 90% nitro some propylene oxide as the igniter and caster oil. I may still have one of the inserts around. This came with their 65 motors. GaryHas anyone ran 90 % Nitro fuel with 10% oil or less... I have been to 70 % but not above... Can the methanol be deleted? or must it remain as a refrigerant?
Joey,One evening at the 1998 World Championships in France, Andy Brown was talking about running 90% nitro fuel. We were at the Ukrainian camp, drinking their wine and vodka.
As I remember it, Andy said that it took a headbutton with 4 glow plugs to burn all of the fuel.
This is the best I can remember from that evening. The Ukrainian vodka was very potent.
Al Hobbs
I can't say that one fuel or another is on the edge. I have a fuel formula book that dates back to 1988 with various fuels that were tested on the dyno & at the lake. 65 nitro, 18.5 men, 1.5 prop, 15 oil ran 84 MPH in my .90 engine. 75 nitro, 10 prop, 15 oil ran 88 MPH. 80 nitro, 12 ethyl, 8 oil ran 92 MPH. The increase in nitro didn't make the engine turn faster, but it did increase the torque & therefore the HP.Jim to you consider us to be on edge with 65 percent? It has became a norm for me?? Many run 65 percent in there boats. I have never been under 60 myself.... 70 percent even seems to be safe? If you can afford the high wear on parts ticket that follows. Many say there is no performance difference from 50-65 But If you have your boat set up correctly & Can prop up there is a Huge Advantage in HIGH Nitro Fuels.
If the fuel functions correctly or does not function correctly depends on many factors which may be beyond the control of most boaters. The design of pipes, heads, transfers, inductions & exhausts, to name a few must be within resonable correctness for exotic fuels to work in any engine.
Ask yourself, why some present day large displacement engines are burning holes in piston crowns? Is this a fuel problem or is there something very basic that is wrong in the engine's design?
Jim Allen
No. High nitro generates high heat only when the engine has been over leaned in an effort to get the fuel to burn. Normal head button shapes; flat top hemi types, double bouble types, toroidal types, can be used effectively without generating high heat. In fact, I ran the straight away engine without any water cooling. The oval engine had a .020" water outlet. Transfer geometry must be correct for whatever type of piston crown; flat, domed, etc is used. I never tested any domed pistons, but the flat top piston was .120" thick with the .250" wrist pin hole .332" down from the top. This left a .032" space between the underside of the piston & the OD of the upper end of the connecting rod. If there was a heat problem, the connecting rod would not have been able to run at 32,000 RPM without any bushing & 6 to 8% oil.If the fuel functions correctly or does not function correctly depends on many factors which may be beyond the control of most boaters. The design of pipes, heads, transfers, inductions & exhausts, to name a few must be within resonable correctness for exotic fuels to work in any engine.
Ask yourself, why some present day large displacement engines are burning holes in piston crowns? Is this a fuel problem or is there something very basic that is wrong in the engine's design?
Jim Allen
Could it be a piston and head button chamber problem , Maybe a thicker piston to handle the heat of high nitro and a better head button chamber that will burn the high nitro fuel.
When you run high nitro it creates high heat in the motor so what you gain with the nitro won't you lose to the heat created .
No. High nitro generates high heat only when the engine has been over leaned in an effort to get the fuel to burn. Normal head button shapes; flat top hemi types, double bouble types, toroidal types, can be used effectively without generating high heat. In fact, I ran the straight away engine without any water cooling. The oval engine had a .020" water outlet. Transfer geometry must be correct for whatever type of piston crown; flat, domed, etc is used. I never tested any domed pistons, but the flat top piston was .120" thick with the .250" wrist pin hole .332" down from the top. This left a .032" space between the underside of the piston & the OD of the upper end of the connecting rod. If there was a heat problem, the connecting rod would not have been able to run at 32,000 RPM without any bushing & 6 to 8% oil.If the fuel functions correctly or does not function correctly depends on many factors which may be beyond the control of most boaters. The design of pipes, heads, transfers, inductions & exhausts, to name a few must be within resonable correctness for exotic fuels to work in any engine.
Ask yourself, why some present day large displacement engines are burning holes in piston crowns? Is this a fuel problem or is there something very basic that is wrong in the engine's design?
Jim Allen
Could it be a piston and head button chamber problem , Maybe a thicker piston to handle the heat of high nitro and a better head button chamber that will burn the high nitro fuel.
When you run high nitro it creates high heat in the motor so what you gain with the nitro won't you lose to the heat created .
The question that should be asked is; do higher speeds require high nitro fuels? A very well known boater by the name of Andy Brown used 60% nitro to set many straight away & oval records.
Jim Allen
Joey,One evening at the 1998 World Championships in France, Andy Brown was talking about running 90% nitro fuel. We were at the Ukrainian camp, drinking their wine and vodka.
As I remember it, Andy said that it took a headbutton with 4 glow plugs to burn all of the fuel.
This is the best I can remember from that evening. The Ukrainian vodka was very potent.
Al Hobbs
You'll need something to get it started, the hard part is making use of it all.
Al,
I've seen one of Andy's "4 plug" motors, might have been the only one.
B
From my experience as you increase nitro percentages You Must lower compression ratio. Each fuel percentage has a ideal compression ratio it likes to operate at. Many May Not know? But on the days you race & the Air Quality is BAD, You can regain the Air back buy going to Higher Nitro, the added Nitro will Produce More Air when compressed since it is a oxygen bearing fuel.. AS for the Rs101 Burn piston problem, they Must have a total piston/bowl volume of 1.0cc, For those that dont find this number the engine must be operated on very low nitro. I run 1.0 cc 60-65 percent fuel in my 101`s & try to get the engine to clean out on the pipe & needle flowing 40 or lower on a blood pressure type flow meter. If you must flow a high number (50-65) to get the engine to clean out. the engine or the pipe size & length, Head buton size, Squish clearence, are out of tune...... the engine will not Live with High Nitro & a Stk Head Volume Size...... Steve wood has the numbers & the tools to correct the volume sizes for most CMB engines.I can't say that one fuel or another is on the edge. I have a fuel formula book that dates back to 1988 with various fuels that were tested on the dyno & at the lake. 65 nitro, 18.5 men, 1.5 prop, 15 oil ran 84 MPH in my .90 engine. 75 nitro, 10 prop, 15 oil ran 88 MPH. 80 nitro, 12 ethyl, 8 oil ran 92 MPH. The increase in nitro didn't make the engine turn faster, but it did increase the torque & therefore the HP.Jim to you consider us to be on edge with 65 percent? It has became a norm for me?? Many run 65 percent in there boats. I have never been under 60 myself.... 70 percent even seems to be safe? If you can afford the high wear on parts ticket that follows. Many say there is no performance difference from 50-65 But If you have your boat set up correctly & Can prop up there is a Huge Advantage in HIGH Nitro Fuels.
If the fuel functions correctly or does not function correctly depends on many factors which may be beyond the control of most boaters. The design of pipes, heads, transfers, inductions & exhausts, to name a few must be within resonable correctness for exotic fuels to work in any engine.
Ask yourself, why some present day large displacement engines are burning holes in piston crowns? Is this a fuel problem or is there something very basic that is wrong in the engine's design?
Jim Allen
I have backed off on nitro Before & replaced it with methonal to add more refrigerant to the fuel. The Big Block CMB`s is about running Hard & Fast & keeping the Plug Happy!!!!! If the plug is Happy the Rest of the Engine is Too. & If your boat is Hauling ass while this is going on You have a good Volume Size....... as funny as it seems the size of the engine is most of the time a good bowl volume size too.If you are running 60-65 percent nitro`s, there was a time I would shim the head button to the moon to find a diff compression, Today I find that it is much better to get the volume correct & try to run minium squish clearences,As the ex timing goes up the chamber size will come down. There is no magic number for the volume on a eng. That is unless you are running stock timing numbers. Then what are stock numbers every time you change the P/S the numbers can change. If you are going to run HIGH nitro you need to do your home work. Check the numbers or you will PAY the price.
It is easy to come up with a head volume number but is it the right number????
You need to know the whole story be for you jump into the pond with High nitro.
David
Enter your email address to join: