Never said my sources were more accurate. My issue with the WSJ, NYT, Washington Post and a majority of the of the bigger papers and mainstream media is they have been highly biased in their reporting when it comes to Donald Trump for the past 10 years. During the 2023-24 Presidential campaigns, it's a known fact that a very large majority of the reports related to Trump have had a very negative spin while almost everything relating to Kamala Harris has a positive spin. I've found that, through a lot of comparison and cross checking, the independent and foreign news sources have been much fairer in their reporting. Another example of this had to do with the trial of the alleged murderer of Laken Riley. One of the mainstream papers ran a headline claiming the guy on trial "NEVER HAD A CHANCE", even though he was in the US illegally, had been arrested(never charged and subsequently released) for assaulting a child in NYC and was identified partially through DNA evidence found at the murder scene. If you really look at the situation, he never gave her a chance and threw away his chance at freedom when he allegedly strangled and beat her to death with a rock.
Needless to say, I look at the reporting from many of the US sources with a high level of skepticism and choose to believe that the accusation that the mainstream media has been acting as the propaganda arm of the Democratic party is more than just a bit deserved.
