Twin mono

Intlwaters

Help Support Intlwaters:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

David Ashcroft

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
1,670
............
 

Attachments

  • 20190202_144247.jpg
    20190202_144247.jpg
    196.6 KB · Views: 16
  • 20190202_144527.jpg
    20190202_144527.jpg
    210.4 KB · Views: 16
Last edited:
 





Code:
video of the first tests with octura propellers x465, the x465, x467, x665 ares too small with 25% nitro
 
I remembered that Jerry Crowther has twin mono with CMB 80s . He told me that his boat was weight around  19lbs and faster &stable 
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks Allan .

19lb is a porker ,, but yes I believe  extra weight is necessary for stability and not affect good top end speed..

Also i think a CG of around 38% would benefit without using Tabs and then I would just use the struts to trim ride...
 
What are the white cylinders in front of the motors. Nice looking boat. Should be scary to drive. 
Code:
these are tanks with constant level, equipped with solex carburetor needle and the float is a ball of deodorant,
 David the weight without fuel is 8.2kg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
David, looks like a fun project.

Gilbert, your friend's boat is very nice. The hopping in the turns and the straights is from the transom lift of those Octura props. You don't want lift in a mono prop. There are many more blade options in the newer ABC line-up that will settle the hull much better and produce faster, smoother lap times.

Have fun!
 
Dennis,


the next tests will be done with octura 16/67 and propshop 67 17/3 cleaver,  with  the octura series X the boat was too aerial, we put a little négative to the struts and lowered a little the flaps
 
"The X series props are non lifting."

That has been the story line for years. Believe what you will.

Back in the day, we tested with X4s, X5s, and X6s. Every one of them needed cupping and back cutting to make them usable for monos.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Den

 1 -Gilberts boat is a subsurface setup so naturally the hull will have more lift as oposed to surface drive.

2 - The CG maybe a little off perhaps

3 - The struts may need adjustment

Considering he only just first testing it was very good.

I know you like to debate Dennis so perhaps go back to Jims and play there haha...
 
No debate Dave. Just stating my experience with X props in years past.

If people don't share their opinion and experience, there is no forum. If you don't want me on your threads, no worries.

Enjoy your project.
 
 X4 are low lift general purpose props

M4 is similar to X4 but with the tongues removed to unload the prop

Y are similar to X series but have 10% more pitch

X5 are similar to X4 with medium lift and more pitch

X6 similar to X4 and X5 with medium-high lift

14 are medium-high lift commonly used for hydros

16 are high lift props for riggers and hydro's

17 are the highest lift prop for riggers and hydros

P7 are similar to 17 series but more rake and slightly less lift

19 are high lift for riggers and hydro's

V9 are moderate lift and high pitch suitable for riggers, hydros and SAW racing

20 are moderatley high lift with high pitch suitable for riggers and hydros

21 are high lift for riggers and hydro's

22 are high lift, highest pitch surface drive only good straight line speed

I thought y all might find this helpful JOHN SS CUSTOM FUEL TANKS 
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Latest posts

Back
Top