Andy Greene
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2006
- Messages
- 10,092
okay Ron- here ya go .
Now - in the other thread you said-
"Andy,
You can't ask why rules exist, but change them if you dont like them. I know this all too well....."
Ron maybe(obviously) you misunderstand my statement- The rules read STOCK -yes?
Does that also include the color of the part?
I understand the ease of looking at a blue jacket -but saying-
" The head and cooling jacket were silver. OS only makes blue." and follow it by -"It was not a stock OS setup"
How does anyone know that ??? If in fact it was not checked ???
Do the rules say " you cannot alter the color of a STOCK part ? I guess the bottom line in my book is- if someone protests my stuff- they best be ready to PROVE me wrong . Not just an assumption based on the color of the part- unless the rule clearly reads that specifically. Its not changing part of a rule cause we dont like it- Its asking for clear cut specifics within the given rule-
But you know that pretty well too dont ya :huh:
Andy
Now - in the other thread you said-
"Andy,
You can't ask why rules exist, but change them if you dont like them. I know this all too well....."
Ron maybe(obviously) you misunderstand my statement- The rules read STOCK -yes?
Does that also include the color of the part?
I understand the ease of looking at a blue jacket -but saying-
" The head and cooling jacket were silver. OS only makes blue." and follow it by -"It was not a stock OS setup"
How does anyone know that ??? If in fact it was not checked ???
Do the rules say " you cannot alter the color of a STOCK part ? I guess the bottom line in my book is- if someone protests my stuff- they best be ready to PROVE me wrong . Not just an assumption based on the color of the part- unless the rule clearly reads that specifically. Its not changing part of a rule cause we dont like it- Its asking for clear cut specifics within the given rule-
But you know that pretty well too dont ya :huh:
Andy
Last edited by a moderator: