Jump to content

rbarile

Members
  • Content Count

    63
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About rbarile

  • Rank
    Newbie

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://rbarile@aol.com
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

135 profile views
  1. rbarile

    mac motor

    Richard barile 140-22 poplar ave flushing, ny 11355 718 539 2266 Wil send pay pal shortly thanks
  2. rbarile

    mac motor

    i would take both , 250 you pay shipping rich B. phone 7185392266
  3. rbarile

    SS CUSTOM FUEL TANKS

    JOHN, NEED 3 TANKS, APPRECIATE A CALL. RICH BARILE 718 539 2266 ITS MY CELL CALL ANY TIME. TALKED TO MIKE C. IN SUMPTER LOVES YOUR WORK THANKS
  4. rbarile

    7075 T6 ROD MATERIAL

    Is there any stress releaving to be done after making the rod , or ruff cut then stress relief. ??? Rich B. thanks. appreciate any input..Press fit bushing heating to what degree. or not??
  5. rbarile

    eagle twin w/mac 84s

    . I’ve read a post or two on this forum to know you have been running Andy’s twin for awhile. I’m sure you know how to check your negative angle in relation to the points of Andy’s hull which should be level. But, to achieve -6 you would have to bend the tube upward and back down to get this and maintain prop depth. Is this what you have done? If so, I’m sure it is a short bend towards the back of your boat. Andy’s engines are usually mounted on 5 degrees and if you ran the shaft straight all the way to the prop , it would be very deep, that is why you have to reduce the angle to get the strut depth. Hi Jeff in experimenting with these new props at first had a little trouble with trying to just get the angle at the strut after finding a good angle I pulled the hole strut off the transom and bent the tube to accommodate the new strut angle to take the stress off the shaft tube. Works fine and haven’t changed the strut depth. Have done this on two twins two 45s and one 90 like I have said -4 to -6 def is where I end up at with the ski -4 with out a ski -5 or -6. Mr. Schafer sent the props. Tried them at half a deg. N. G..put heavy load on the engines and they quit immediaty. Spoke to Schafer he stated 1 to 2 deg is sufficeint What he suggested is cut the middle of pad out so to get more adjustment. Got my 1667 finally runing with a bar cut and cutting the dog ears off reducing the load, boats moving nicely . Rich b.
  6. rbarile

    O.S. #9B carburetors for sale

    I"ll take all three call me 718 539 2266 Rich barile
  7. rbarile

    eagle twin w/mac 84s

    Dont think I can get the 5/6 degrees ski is already in place Is it worth the effort for the speed increase and stabiltiy???
  8. Have twin eagle with rear ski pads , no rear sponses. Will abc props work cleaver type, Im running 1667s with considerable lift. abc cleaver type have considerably less lift. I can not drop my strut , only can angle , will it they work??? appreciate input Rich B.
  9. rbarile

    AA 67 parabolic pipe and AA header

    Like to purchase your setup , give me a call for address rich barile 718 539 2266 thank you.
  10. rbarile

    Tuned Pipes for sale

    WOULD LIKE TO BUY THE 2 AA PIPE IF OK CALL 718 539 2266 Rich B.
  11. rbarile

    MAC 84 VS CMB 80 CASE

    Sam sent you a email on your mac 67 How much and can you call me Rich B.
  12. rbarile

    MAC 84 VS CMB 80 CASE

    mac 67 case gets too hard to line up porting after the bore procedure especially front transfer near exhaust , tried it once. Have to take out alot of case material. Exhaust going to pipe is smaller also, as you bore out the case the transferes and boost walls become further apart alot of work. all intake tracts are smaller on the 67 going to outer part of case. With the cmb going up on the port 1mm shouldnt be too much?? IF crank and rear end bolt pattern are the same might work with out to much work??
  13. rbarile

    MAC 84 VS CMB 80 CASE

    mac 67 case gets too hard to line up porting after the bore procedure especially front transfer near exhaust , tried it once. Have to take out alot of case material. Exhaust going to pipe is smaller also, as you bore out the case the transferes and boost walls become further apart alot of work. all intake tracts are smaller on the 67 going to outer part of case. With the cmb going up on the port 1mm shouldnt be too much?? IF crank and rear end bolt pattern are the same good might work with out to much work??
  14. rbarile

    MAC 84 VS CMB 80 CASE

    Will the mac crank fit in the bearings and line up to the rod ?? And the sleeve, slip in properly?? Boring the case no problem . Is the bolt pattern for the back end the same?? Dont have cmb case on hand trying to see if its worth the effort.
  15. rbarile

    MAC 84 VS CMB 80 CASE

    Cracked a mac 84 case actually a few over the years. My question is would a cmb 80 case accept the mac 84 internals. I know the stroke is 1mm longer on the mac, but will the mac crank fit the bearing is my main concern. The sleeve i can do a shim under the lip. The liner I think will fit?? appreciate the input , thanks Rich B.
×